Embers in a tarnish governance..

Somethings have sprung to my mind when i recalled the serial public discussions with Jurnal Perempuan counterparts—lots of Non Governmental Organizations, for instance law aid institution—or in Indonesia, we call it Lembaga Bantuan Hukum (LBH) Jakarta, LBH Apik, a Coalition of Indonesian Women etc. I don’t deem them as scumbags for the government mechanisms yet i envisage them as embers in a tardy-governanced country, our beloved archipelagic Indonesia.

They audaciously speak about the festering wounds amid the Jakarta or generally—Indonesia societies. They whip on the government for the fair law enforcement for the rabbles. As for, living in Jakarta is so much uneasy for the poors and the disabled people. They’re classified as marginalized groups, often detracted from social facilities, disenfranchised and racked by the mainstream society, or to say the least, by the Satpol PP—Satuan Polisi Pamong Praja—sort of an official police division.

The NGO thereafter lean against the unfair justice hailed by the central government. Thankfully, they’re hefty granted by many funders—e.g. United Nations, Ford Foundations, etc. They stand for their fellow what-so-called a trifling part of society. All the NGOs huddle to repel the supercillious rules and incur many risks.

Well, i have a hunch,..while our society engulfed by the capitalist—yeaah let say..we’re hooked on branded high-tech gizmos, we’re busy of embellishing ourselves by high-brow apparel brands, our under-privileged family still dwells under the bridges, at the river sides, even under the firmament.

I deeply concern about the trend of jeering society towards them. Should the NGOs keep pestering our government and society to show an endearment for them??! I’m not trying to give some caveats of the ever-existence innate and tenacious society gap. We shall attune to the multifacet of society. Give them space to practice their own politics.

Frankly speaking, i do not assault them who keep on basking and self-preening. It’s your damn right to enjoy your stardom living in such an opulence, to have such wanderlusts. What i’m trying to do is bursting out an awareness of our crooked picture of society.

These things need not to be fixed out. The poverty is such a structural gander of society. The government entrepreneurial bent must refurbish the vendors especially for the street vendors, by funding them and allocating more budget for their development. Or else, by empowering the nascent vendors—in the small town or in the city.

To put in another side, in spite of ramming the capitalist blow, i shall think about how to deal with them. I’m not accusing the NGOs are near-sighted in favoring the capitalists. Well, i’m fetching something beyond the mere-niggardly capitalists. We need to be tactful, such as gripping progression of ideas on corporate social responsibility and community development. My advice for the NGOs...don’t put yourself in an enmity to the capitalists...please concoct a negotiated-mode of your contention..for the sake of our enduring idealist projects.

A concern for global warming-set up by British Embassy

it's just a summary of a short discussion back from several months before yet still interesting to be acknowledged...enjoy=)

On May 2nd 2007, Indonesian Student Association for International
Studies hold a discussion in British Embassy of Jakarta. The
discussion is one of the ISAFIS main program under the name of Short
International Studies Basic Course (SISBAC). The topic discussed was
around UK Environmental Policy in Global Warming Era. This discussion
meets students demand of apprehending how UK government acts toward
the global climate change.
By presenting the Draft Climate Change Bill in the UK, Pierce Cazelet
as the representative of UK embassy related to this issue, convince us
about the delicacy of the matter. This aggravating matters could
impact the physical and human geography of the planet and startlingly,
Indonesia being scrutinized as the third country contributes to global
warming damage by its rampage deforestation.
For UK government, 2007-2008 is a critical year in persuading
international partners to sign up multilateral negotiations for our
global concern. This discussion notes several key events in 2007,
starting from March with European Union Spring Council, on June G8
Summit, on September Gleaneagles Dialogue and closing on December with
UNFCCC in Bali, Indonesia.
Amongst European Countries, United Kingdom proclaim to be the first
country succeed in forestalling the adverse effects of global climate
change. Instead of merely stengthening the carbon management in the UK
as the anticipation of the impacts, UK initiates a leverage conduct
internationally as the vanguard for developing countries in
environmental policy.
The draft regarding the climate change bill in the UK emphasizes four
general points to be stressed out by the UK government. First are
about targets and budgets oriented towards carbon dioxide emission
reductions of 60% by 2050 and 26%-32% by 2020, through action in the
UK and abroad. To accomplish this, there should be an arrangement for
five-year budgets. Second is establishing a commitee on climate change
as an independent body to advise government on its carbon budgets and
allocation for its least cost savings. Third is determining enabling
powers by introducing emissions trading schemes more quickly and
easily. Fourth is getting the Committee on Climate Change to report
annually on progress towards targets and budgets followed by the
government to report at least every five years on adaptation.
This draft bill is the UK government next step in environmental policy
after the Kyoto Protocol ends in 2012, and so far, this bill was
published for consultation and pre-legislative scrutiny on 13 March
2007 and will be introduced in Autumn 2007.
Instead of thinking the global climate change as solely an
environmental problem, UK Government consider it of being a security
international area because the cumulative impact of climate change
could exacerbate the drivers of conflict and in particular, increase
the risk to those state and regions already susceptible to conflict.
The security risks in the global context e.g. border disputes, massive
migration, security of energy supplies, resource shortages—in food and
water, development failures and societal stress, and humanitarian crises.
Through this discussion, UK instills us deeper thoughts about
environment-oriented world economy. As a matter of fact, the two
things are in conjunction. For developing countries, the first thing
to be lined up is refraining from using the fossil fuels. This thing
however, encourage us to find alternatives for fossil fuels needed by
manufacturing industry which is common in Indonesia.
In spite of idealistic framework of environmental policy UK government
brings us about, we believe that an adaptation of climate change bill
in Indonesia would be strenous because it must deal with many tiers of
government and many sectors of civil society. Even as a mandatory, a
propellent in executing an environmental policy entails the cease of
illegal logging activities. Moreover, lobbying with Indonesian
government does not involve upper level only but also all the levels
of the government.
As for the ever-existence gap of knowledge among society, the
fundamental thing to do is breaching the gap of knowledge about
contriving the environment-oriented industrial programs, either
home-industry or large scale industry such as transnational corporation.
To fetch this point, all the Indonesian people must conjoin their
vision together in preserving their nature of homeland as an effort
–in terms of keeping sustainability of our living by undermining the
threat of global climate change. The discussion in the grassroot level
would indeed be a remaining mediation about how to expound a
technology-environmental friendly utilized in Indonesian industrial
operations.

Reporting all those feminist thoughts

My mind is wandering to other side of the universe..im thinking about what others might tell about your profession as a feminist yeaah or at least working as a reporter who reports all those thoughts daily. well, im quite fond of it, yet as a matter of fact, im not that purely feminist. What i like about this office and the ambience surrounds me is a family-sense of working that u can feel which could moderate your anger and your hectic.
Being a reporter is not that easy, you mix all the thoughts and the fact on reality, objectively..well, d u know guys, that no such 100% objective things exist?! and you should stand for your writings responsibly as though your editor may attack your opinion or neglect your writings.
For me, it doesn't mean anything instead. I learn alot from Jurnal Perempuan Foundation, i've met many great women and men who could strain other parties and gain much popularities because their radical minds. All i wanna do is making some changes for this life..and live to the fullest..